Tags: Tourism Industry Research PaperDr Seuss Scholarship EssayBook Report Poem By Carol Diggory ShieldsHome Based Business PlanFirst Aid At Work CourseAnalysis Essay Introduction ExampleRelevance Of The Beautiful And Other EssaysGood Thesis Statement Against AbortionNursing Research Proposal Ideas
She previously was a professor at Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University, where she founded the Center for the Study of the Administrative State.in the immortal words of Nick Hornby, “the music or the misery?“Implying that a drunk woman has no control of her actions, but that a drunk man does strips women of all moral responsibility.”In a 1995 book review in the Yale Free Press about a book called “In Defense of Elitism,” Rao wrote that, “In this age of affirmative action, women’s rights, special rights for the handicapped and welfare for the indigent and lazy, elitism is a forgotten and embarrassing concept.” Rao agreed with some of the author's sentiments in support of elitism, writing that many of the book's criticisms of egalitarianism “ring true.” Later in the piece, Rao praised the author’s arguments “against the shoddy standards of feminist scholarship, which attempts to fabricate a rich history of female work where none exists.”Rao wrote critically about affirmative action, including in a November 1996 piece for the Weekly Standard in which she called it "the anointed dragon of liberal excess."Rao was involved in conservative life at Yale beyond her writings, and was caught up in a controversy in 1993 as a member of the Party of the Right, a conservative student group.
He was also accused of failing to disclose his college writings to a state nominating committee; he maintained that he had followed all instructions. Tim Scott, the only black Republican in the Senate, broke ranks in refusing to support Bounds; he also refused to support North Carolina judicial nominee Thomas Farr and wrote a piece in the Wall Street Journal last month saying Republicans “should stop bringing candidates with questionable track records on race before the full Senate for a vote.”In a 1996 piece in the Weekly Standard critical of the recent work of two black scholars, Henry Louis Gates Jr.
Some court-watchers have argued against giving weight to nominees’ undergraduate writings — David Lat, editor-at-large of legal news site Above the Law, wrote earlier this year in an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal that, “Collegiate scribblings from decades ago should have no bearing on one’s fitness for public office, and making an issue of them is bad for the country.”Asked about that, Aron said that Rao had decades to disavow what she wrote in college and had not.
Aron pointed to a speech Rao gave in June that, according to notes that she included in her nomination materials, indicated that Rao spoke about how she “enjoyed participating in the debates of that time with my classmates.”Rao’s writings since college continued to underscore her conservative leanings, but they changed in substance and tone — she’s written multiple scholarly papers on the subject of human dignity as it relates to constitutional rights, and her op-eds don’t use the kind of rhetoric she embraced in her early twenties.
Like Bounds did in a piece he wrote as an undergraduate student at Stanford University in 1995, Rao cited a racial slur that she accused others of using.“Those who reject their assigned categories are called names: So-called conforming blacks are called ‘oreos’ by members of their own community, conservatives become ‘fascists.’ Preaching tolerance, multiculturalists seldom practice it,” Rao wrote.
Bounds’ critics pointed to racially charged language he used in his college writings.