Tags: Courseworks MaintenanceSample Qualitative Research ProposalEssay About Martin Luther King SpeechesHow To Make Yourself Write An EssayInternational Organizations EssayScience Assignment Help
More specifically, I explore how his theoretical concerns to preserve the poetic within the philosophical and to highlight the role of the literary moment in intellectual change are allied to his methodological turn away from argument and towards re-description.
he very fact that these rhetorical perspectives (writing, style, re-description, narrative and so forth) are so privileged encourages us to consider the possibly figural dimension of Rortys own writing, the metaphorical investments that make his critical position possible as well as the literary inflections of his prose.
The key question, of course, is whether these rhetorical perspectives are constitutive of his writing; whether Rortys style, in fact, is as important as he claims.
Conversely, within Hartmanas the ultimate ambition of philosophical prose.
Given the non-rational nature of intellectual development, indeed, non-inferential and literary language has far more potential.
The upshot of this attempt is that philosophy always aims for a closed and total vocabulary.
This is in direct contrast, of course, to Rorty] wants to invoke the distinction between inferential connections between sentences, the connections which give the words used in those sentences their meaning, and non-inferential associations between words, associations which are not dependent upon their use in sentences.Beginning with Rortys consideration of these concepts, in Essays on Heidegger and Others: Philosophical Papers Volume 2 (hereafter EHO) and Contingency, Irony and Solidarity (hereafter CIS moment as occurring periodically in many different areas of culture: science, philosophy, painting and politics, as well as the lyric and the drama.Literary moments, then, are not confined to literature.Beginning with an examination of the importance of the literary moment and the poetic as Rorty conceives of them, I question whether these theoretical emphases are borne out in the practice of his writing.Richard Rorty is well-known for his provocative prose.The point is not to involve oneself in the current language game, but to inspire a new one.Rorty concludes, The crucial point here is that Rortys emphasis on the non-rational development of scientific knowledge ties in with his model of literary invention.Interested not in etymologies but in resonances, Heidegger insists that the only way to avoid the identification of truth with power is to conceive of our final vocabularies not as means to ends but as houses of Being.This claim requires him to poetize philosophical language by letting the phonemes themselves, and not just their uses, be consequential.The clarity and transparency sought after by argumentative macho metaphysicians can be thought of as a way of implying that only inferential connections matter, because only those are relevant to argumentation.In this view, words matter only because one makes propositions, and thus arguments, out of them.