Safie's affinity for the Christian religion is best shown in her revulsionat the prospect of returning to the Turkish land and her desire to marry a Christian and remain in Europe.
Safie's affinity for the Christian religion is best shown in her revulsionat the prospect of returning to the Turkish land and her desire to marry a Christian and remain in Europe.Tags: Descriptive Essay Christmas TimeCritical Thinking Fallacies ListWater Shortage Research PaperEssay About Ebenezer ScroogeBelieve Myself EssayAs I Lay Dying Essay TopicsGre Practice Essay ScoringCritical Review Of A Research PaperMasters Dissertation Help
Many theorists, such as Benveniste who said, "Consciousness of self [orsubjectivity] is only possible if it is experienced by contrast," argue thatone's subjectivity can only exist in their relation to the Other(85).
Thesubject's relation this "Other" depends on which aspect is being examined.
Frankenstein: The Subjectivity of the Character "Safie"Frankenstein: The Subjectivity of the Character "Safie"Even though she is only mentioned in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein for arelatively brief period, the character, Safie, is very interesting as she isunique from the other characters in that her subjectivity is more clearlydependent on her religion and the culture of her nation.
Contrasts can be madebetween the Orient and the European society which attempts to interpret it.
As a result, the newer interpretations offered here address some major unresolved quandaries in the history of Western culture.
Mainly through the work of my fellow contributor's, then, we collectively offer new insights about long-standing issues in the West: the relationship between sentimentality and sadism, the role and nature of parody in human creativity, the need for several radical repressions for the enforcement of a patriarchal society, and the parallels between dream-language and the movement between images in modern motion pictures.Because of the questions raised by these readings, as well as in Frankenstein's dream, these essays claim, we are thrown back on and must therefore confront the most basic ways in which Western self-representation has occured over the last several centuries.[go to Hogle's essay] Anne Williams, "'Mummy, possest': Sadism and Sensibility in Shelley's Frankenstein" Frankenstein's dream after "giving birth" suggests that the creature represents the unspeakable body of the mother within the Symbolic Order.Forexample, when dealing with gender, it would be the relationship between Man and Woman and when dealing with nationality it would be the relationship between Native and Foreigner.Thus, the character of Safie was defined in terms of herrelationship to those around her.The two "illustrious poets," according to her, "annoyed by the platitude of prose, speedily relinquished their uncongenial task." Polidori, too, is made to seem careless, unable to handle his story of a "skull-headed lady." Though Mary Shelley is just as deprecating when she speaks of her own "tiresome unlucky ghost story," she also suggests that its sources went deeper.Her truant muse became active as soon as she fastened on the "idea" of "making only a transcript of the grim terrors of my waking dream": "'I have found it! Hogle, "The Dream of Frankenstein: An Introduction" There are really two main "dreams" in Mary Shelley's original Frankenstein novel: Victor Frankenstein's daydream about the grand future effects of his creating artifical life and the nightmare into which he falls after he recoils from his finished creature in revulsion and exhaustion.This second dream, quite complex, has become the subject of many interpretations, particularly in the twentieth century.What terrified me will terrify others."' The twelve essays in this collection attest to the endurance of Mary Shelley's "waking dream." Appropriately, though less romantically, this book also grew out of a playful conversation at a party.When several of the contributors to this book discovered that they were all closet aficionados of Mary Shelley's novel, they decided that a book might be written in which each contributor-contestant might try to account for the persistent hold that Frankenstein continues to exercise on the popular imagination.