But the answer probably involves generational shifts as well.Childhood itself has changed greatly during the past generation.Stories of abducted children appeared more frequently in the news, and in 1984, images of them began showing up on milk cartons.
But the answer probably involves generational shifts as well.Childhood itself has changed greatly during the past generation.Stories of abducted children appeared more frequently in the news, and in 1984, images of them began showing up on milk cartons.Tags: Essay Openers IdeasLaw And Justice Essay A LevelNature Club EssayStrategy Business PlanHow To Write An Essay To Get Into CollegeWhy Is A Literature Review Of Recent Research Papers Of Great Use To ScientistsPersonal Ambitions EssayHomework NeededRube Goldberg Assignment
In February, Laura Kipnis, a professor at Northwestern University, wrote an essay in The Chronicle of Higher Education describing a new campus politics of sexual paranoia—and was then subjected to a long investigation after students who were offended by the article and by a tweet she’d sent filed Title IX complaints against her.
In June, a professor protecting himself with a pseudonym wrote an essay for Vox describing how gingerly he now has to teach.
Many Baby Boomers and Gen Xers can remember riding their bicycles around their hometowns, unchaperoned by adults, by the time they were 8 or 9 years old.
In the hours after school, kids were expected to occupy themselves, getting into minor scrapes and learning from their experiences.
After the 1999 Columbine massacre in Colorado, many schools cracked down on bullying, implementing “zero tolerance” policies.
In a variety of ways, children born after 1980—the Millennials—got a consistent message from adults: life is dangerous, but adults will do everything in their power to protect you from harm, not just from strangers but from one another as well.As each side increasingly demonizes the other, compromise becomes more difficult.A recent study shows that implicit or unconscious biases are now at least as strong across political parties as they are across races.(Greg Lukianoff is a constitutional lawyer and the president and CEO of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, which defends free speech and academic freedom on campus, and has advocated for students and faculty involved in many of the incidents this article describes; Jonathan Haidt is a social psychologist who studies the American culture wars.The stories of how we each came to this subject can be read here.) The dangers that these trends pose to scholarship and to the quality of American universities are significant; we could write a whole essay detailing them.It prepares them poorly for professional life, which often demands intellectual engagement with people and ideas one might find uncongenial or wrong. A campus culture devoted to policing speech and punishing speakers is likely to engender patterns of thought that are surprisingly similar to those long identified by cognitive behavioral therapists as causes of depression and anxiety.The new protectiveness may be teaching students to think pathologically.These same children grew up in a culture that was (and still is) becoming more politically polarized.Republicans and Democrats have never particularly liked each other, but survey data going back to the 1970s show that on average, their mutual dislike used to be surprisingly mild.But in this essay we focus on a different question: What are the effects of this new protectiveness on the students themselves? What exactly are students learning when they spend four years or more in a community that polices unintentional slights, places warning labels on works of classic literature, and in many other ways conveys the sense that words can be forms of violence that require strict control by campus authorities, who are expected to act as both protectors and prosecutors?There’s a saying common in education circles: Don’t teach students what to think; teach them how to think. Today, what we call the Socratic method is a way of teaching that fosters critical thinking, in part by encouraging students to question their own unexamined beliefs, as well as the received wisdom of those around them.