Nationalism Vs Sectionalism Essay

In 1986, the Pulitzer Prize–winning, bowtie-wearing Stanford historian Carl Degler delivered something other than the usual pipe-smoking, scotch-on-the-rocks, after-dinner disquisition that had plagued the evening program of the annual meeting of the American Historical Association for nearly all of its centurylong history.Instead, Degler, a gentle and quietly heroic man, accused his colleagues of nothing short of dereliction of duty: appalled by nationalism, they had abandoned the study of the nation.

Tags: Business Plan GuidanceHow To Write A Humorous EssayEssay Requirements For UcfRedbronze Master ThesisCollege Application Essay For Pharmacy SchoolBusiness Plan For Poultry Farm

And this change in our economic philosophy brought with it a change in our entire philosophy of life.

It is this second change that Professor Schlesinger undertakes to portray.

In an essay on “The West—18,” he treats this urbanization and industrial development in a specific section, but his treatment has greater moderation, and some element of doubt as to the eternal goodness embodied in this progress.

And the West remains a section, or a group of sections, that yet differ from other parts of the United States, and will for a long time resist any efforts toward complete standardization.

And historians seemed to believe that if they stopped studying it, it would die sooner: starved, neglected, and abandoned. Fascism and communism were dead, Fukuyama announced at the end of the Cold War.

Francis Fukuyama is a political scientist, not a historian. Nationalism, the greatest remaining threat to liberalism, had been “defanged” in the West, and in other parts of the world where it was still kicking, well, that wasn’t quite nationalism.But it cannot be portrayed adequately when the basic and causal forces that brought about almost a social revolution are entirely neglected. Schlesinger writes with considerable understanding of the break-up of the old South into a new land of small farms and small industrial concerns, and with greater penetration of the conquest of the frontier West.Once this limitation is recognized, the book becomes immensely valuable. But he is most at home when he describes the appeal of the city, and the physical and scientific advances that it produced. Dilemma caused many conflicts for the Lignite States.The nation celebrated its culture and virtues, adopted Henry Clays American System, was united politically until the years prior to the election of 1 824, and dad auspicious declarations with European powers.After the war of 1 812, the people of the United States felt enormous pride in winning a war against the almighty Britain and used their nationalism to inspire improvements. Many people of the South shared John Randolph view that it was “unjust, to aggravate the burdens of the people for the purpose of favoring the manufactures. A) Furthermore, the Panic of 1 819, which was chiefly the fault of the 2nd Bank of the United States, hindered the nation’s growth. This course of action damaged businesses and farms throughout the county thus people could not pay their loans.Beginning with James Monomer’s election in 1816, Monroe (Republican) won the election with an outstanding ratio of 1 83 electoral votes to his opponent Rufus Kings (Federalist) 34 votes. As a result banks foreclosed people’s properties but even then, banks could not sell the mortgages.At first glance, these two volumes seem to have little relation to each other.Frederick Jackson Turner’s “Significance of Sections” is a posthumous collection of essays, arranged by Max Farrand. In plan and in content, these two books seem far apart.Then in 1820, Monroe had no formidable opponent and acquired every vote expect, thus marking the end of the Federalist party. This dominoes effect destroyed the nation’s economy and stymied the national pride.The nation was more untied than the pre-war era due to the emergence of the National Republican Party which had a hybrid of both Federalist and Republican beliefs. Due to the sectionalism conflicts of slavery and economic issues, it is palpable that the years 1815 to 1 825 was not completely an Era of Good Feelings but bad feelings as well.